Article 218. Violation of the rules for accounting, storage, transportation and use of explosives, flammable substances and pyrotechnic products

Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the latest edition:

Article 145 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Unreasonable refusal to hire or unjustified dismissal of a pregnant woman or a woman with children under three years of age

Unjustified refusal to hire or unjustified dismissal of a woman on the grounds of her pregnancy, as well as unjustified refusal to hire or unjustified dismissal from work of a woman who has children under three years of age, for these reasons -

shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of up to two hundred thousand rubles, or in the amount of the wages or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to eighteen months, or by compulsory labor for a period of up to three hundred and sixty hours.

Return to the table of contents of the document: Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the latest edition

Article 144 Part 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, old code

Actions provided for in the first part of this article, committed by arson or other generally dangerous means or resulting in human casualties or other grave consequences, as well as committed against a person in connection with the performance of his official or public duty or against his close relatives, as well as others persons whose life and health are encroached upon in order to prevent the legitimate activities of the specified official, as well as deliberate pollution of forests with harmful substances, waste, emissions, garbage, leading to drying out or disease of trees, shrubs or other vegetation, or intentional significant damage or destruction forest areas by arson - is punishable by imprisonment for a term of three to ten years.
(ed. Attention

Art. 3301; 1996. No. 9. Art. 773; No. 34. Art. 4026; 1999. No. 28. Art. 3471; 2001. No. 17. Art. 1644; No. 21. Art. 2063; 2002.

No. 12. Art. 1093; No. 48. Art. 7446; Art. 4737; 2003. No. 2. Art. 167; No. 52 (part 1). Art. 5034; 2004. No. 27. Art. Article 144 p3 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR of 1961, which specifically in 1961 it read like this: Article 144. Theft Secret theft of personal property of citizens (theft) is punishable by imprisonment for a term of up to two years or correctional labor for a term of up to one year. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. And this article is 158. The statute of limitations is if for the first part it is 2 years. Article 144 part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation What is a mole cricket? And there is also a class of insects! Exemption from criminal liability as a means of its differentiation Text. Report of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation “On the activities of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation in 2006” Text.

Article 144. theft

Important

In Articles 144 - 147.2, theft is understood as the unlawful gratuitous seizure and (or) conversion of someone else's property for the benefit of the perpetrator or other persons, committed for mercenary purposes, causing damage to the owner or other holder of this property. In articles 144 - 147.

1 theft of property, regardless of the method of theft, is recognized as committed on a large scale if it is committed by one person or a group of persons in an amount that exceeds two hundred times the minimum wage established by the legislation of the Russian Federation at the time the crime was committed.

Articles 144, 145, 147, 147.1 and 148 recognize a repeated crime committed by a person who has previously committed any of the crimes provided for in these articles or articles 77, 146, 148.1, 218.1, 223.1 and 224.1 of this Code. (edited)

Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR part 1

The same actions committed repeatedly or by prior conspiracy by a group of persons, as well as theft of state property by an official abusing his official position, are punishable by imprisonment for a term of up to five years with or without confiscation of property. Actions provided for in parts one or two of this article, committed on a large scale or by an organized group, are punishable by imprisonment for a term of five to ten years with confiscation of property. (edited)

of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, a special subject is a person using his official position; 4) the subjective side: characterized by direct intent.

The perpetrator realizes that by his actions he is interfering with the legitimate activities of journalists by forcing them to disseminate or refuse to disseminate information, and wants to commit these actions.

Qualified elements of a crime are: - the same act committed by a person using his official position (Part 2 of Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation); - acts provided for in Part.

1 or 2 of this article, combined with violence against a journalist or his relatives or with damage or destruction of their property, as well as with the threat of using such violence (Part 3 of Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). 2. Applicable legislation: 1) Constitution of the Russian Federation (Part 5 of Article 29); 2) Law of the Russian Federation “On the Mass Media” (Articles 2, 58, 59, 60, etc.).

Article of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR 144

Theft committed on a large scale, or by an organized group, or by a particularly dangerous repeat offender, is punishable by imprisonment for a term of four to ten years with confiscation of property. Note. Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR Article 144. Obstruction of the legitimate professional activities of journalists 1.

Obstructing the legitimate professional activities of journalists by forcing them to disseminate or refuse to disseminate information is punishable by a fine in the amount of fifty to one hundred times the minimum wage, or in the amount of the wages or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to one month, or by compulsory labor for a period of up to one hundred and eighty hours, or correctional labor for up to one year. Article 144 JavaScript is prohibited from running in your browser. Enable JavaScript, or many of the site's features will not be available to you. In cases established by law, the rights of a journalist, including the dissemination of information, may be limited. Thus, the dissemination of information: revealing special technical techniques and tactics for conducting a counter-terrorism operation is not allowed; capable of complicating the conduct of a counter-terrorism operation and creating a threat to the life and health of people who find themselves in the zone of the counter-terrorism operation or who are outside the specified zone; serving to promote or justify terrorism and extremism; on employees of special units, members of the operational headquarters for managing the counter-terrorism operation during its implementation, as well as on persons providing assistance in carrying out this operation (see Article 2 of the Federal Law of 03/06/2006 N 35-FZ “On Countering Terrorism”

Source: https://dtpstory.ru/st-144-ch-1-uk-rf-staryj-kodeks/

AZ-libr.ru

Notes. 1. In the articles of this Code, theft refers to the illegal gratuitous seizure and (or) conversion of someone else’s property for the benefit of the perpetrator or other persons, committed for mercenary purposes, causing damage to the owner or other holder of this property. 2. Significant damage to a citizen in the articles of this chapter is determined taking into account his property status, but cannot be less than two thousand five hundred rubles. 3. In the articles of this chapter, premises are understood as buildings and structures, regardless of the form of ownership, intended for the temporary residence of people or the placement of material assets for production or other official purposes. In the articles of this chapter, storage means utility premises separated from residential buildings, areas of territory, main pipelines, and other structures, regardless of the form of ownership, that are equipped with fencing or technical means or provided with other security and are intended for permanent or temporary storage of material assets. 4. In the articles of this chapter, the value of property exceeding two hundred and fifty thousand rubles is recognized as large, and especially large - one million rubles.

.

Comm. Verin V.P.

1. Legislator in note. to the commented article retained the concept of “theft” as an unlawful gratuitous seizure and (or) conversion of someone else’s property for the benefit of the perpetrator or other persons, committed for mercenary purposes, causing damage to the owner or other holder of this property. The concept of theft covers a group of criminal attacks on someone else's property. Depending on the method of execution

Crimes in the Criminal Code highlight such forms of theft as theft (Article 158), fraud (Article 159), embezzlement (Article 160), robbery (Article 161), robbery (Article 162).
A special place in the Criminal Code is occupied by extortion (Article 163), which is not related to theft, but has a number of characteristics identical to them. 2. The subject
of theft is property, and
the object is
property relations, i.e.
social relations in the sphere of distribution of material goods for collective or individual use. The subject of theft is always material, i.e. must have real characteristics. This can be any thing created by a person and possessing material or spiritual value, money, securities that have a nominal value, documents that serve as equivalents of money. Documents of a non-property nature, as well as those that have no value but provide the right to receive property (baggage receipts, invoices, etc.), cannot be the subject of this crime, while theft of them for the purpose of using them to obtain property is preparation for committing fraud. 3. Theft is a property crime, therefore its subject cannot be objects of intellectual property, as well as electrical or thermal energy. 4. The subject of theft can only be someone else’s property
.
The Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, in resolution No. 5 of April 25, 1995, explained that “the subject of theft and other crimes, liability for the commission of which is provided for by the norms of Chapter. 5 of the Criminal Code of the RSFSR, is someone else’s property, that is, not in the property or legal possession of the perpetrator.” 5. Both movable and immovable property, as well as property withdrawn from civil circulation, can be stolen. In case of theft of property that may pose a danger to society or people's health (radioactive substances, weapons, narcotic substances, etc.), the act is qualified under the relevant articles of Chapter. 24 of the Criminal Code. 6. The main method of theft is the seizure of property from the owner or other owner. In the case where the offender is in possession of someone else's property by virtue of the fact that it has been entrusted to him, the transition of lawful to unlawful possession can be characterized as a formal seizure. 7. One of the mandatory signs of theft is gratuitousness. It is the gratuitous seizure of someone else's property that entails causing damage to the owner or other possessor of the property. The seizure of someone else's property, which is not associated with causing damage to the owner or other possessor of this property, is not theft if the person who committed the seizure pays for it in full in return or provides other equivalent compensation. 8. In case of theft, property is used by the perpetrator for his own benefit or for the benefit of other persons. The person who steals the property, although he does not legally become its owner, actually owns, uses and disposes of it as his own. In this regard, temporary mercenary use of someone else’s property, in which the offender owns and uses someone else’s property, but does not dispose of it, should be distinguished from theft. Such actions, if certain signs are present, may be qualified under Art. 165, 166 CC. 9. The theft is considered completed if the property is confiscated and the perpetrator has a real opportunity to dispose of it at his own discretion or use it1 {USSR Air Force.
1972. No. 4. P. 14.} .
If the culprit, having committed certain actions, managed to take possession of the thing or, having taken possession, was not able to dispose of it as his own due to circumstances beyond his control, the act is qualified as attempted theft. The exception is robbery, which is considered completed from the moment of the attack for the purpose of stealing someone else's property, in the presence of the signs specified in the disposition of Art. 162 of the Criminal Code. 10. One of the signs of the objective side
of theft is the crime causing material damage to the owner or other owner of the property.
11. Criminal liability for theft is not limited to a minimum amount if it is associated with the forcible seizure of property. For petty theft of someone else's property through theft, robbery, fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement, administrative liability is provided under Art. 7.27 Code of Administrative Offences. 12. Material damage caused to the owner or other possessor of property must be in a causal connection with the actions of the person who committed the theft. 13. To resolve the issue of the presence or absence of theft, the opinion of the owner of the stolen property does not matter whether damage has been caused to him or not and whether the perpetrator should be held criminally liable. Cases of crimes against someone else's, including state, property are matters of public prosecution and do not require the consent of the owner or legal owner of the property that has become the subject of a criminal attack to initiate them (clause 2 of the resolution of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation dated April 25, 1995 No. 5). 14.
A sane individual is recognized
as the subject Responsibility under Art. 158, 161, 162 of the Criminal Code, as well as under Art. 163, 166 and part 2 of Art. 167 of the Criminal Code, begins at the age of 14, and according to Art. 159, 160 of the Criminal Code and for other crimes against property - from 16 years of age. 15. From the subjective side
, any theft presupposes the presence of
direct intent
aimed at the criminal seizure of someone else’s property with
the aim of
turning it into one’s own benefit or transferring it to other persons for personal gain.
The culprit is always aware not only of the social danger of his actions, but also of the fact that the property belongs to others. He foresees the inevitable occurrence of material damage for the owner or other owner of the property and desires this. 16. Selfish motives determine the direction of intent to steal, but accomplices may have other motives. However, in any case, they must be aware of the nature of the crime committed by the perpetrator. It is unacceptable to be found guilty of theft if a person took someone else's property not for selfish reasons, but out of other personal interest or falsely understood official interests, as well as for temporary use with its subsequent return. Along with selfish motives for theft, there may also be accompanying motives (hooliganism, revenge, etc.). Moreover, the presence of any of these motives in the absence of a selfish motive excludes the classification of the act as theft. 17. From the objective side
, theft is a form of theft and is defined by law as the secret theft of someone else’s property.
It differs from other forms of theft by secretly taking property. As a rule, theft is committed in the absence of the owner, other owner of the stolen property and unauthorized persons (for example, burglary or theft associated with illegal entry into the premises or other storage). If the seizure of property occurs in the presence of its owner, who does not notice this, as was intended by the perpetrator, there is theft. Theft is also considered to be the taking of property when the perpetrator uses a circumstance in which the victim does not perceive what is happening (for example, drunk or sleeping) to secretly seize it. The actions of the perpetrator should also be qualified as theft in the case where the criminal, although he confiscates someone else’s property in the presence of many people, but those present do not realize the illegality of his actions, since they do not know who owns the property, or there are other circumstances misleading them. 18. All explanations of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation on the distinction between theft from robbery, from the appropriation of entrusted property (Article 160 of the Criminal Code), from property found or accidentally found on the street that is not punishable under the Criminal Code, on the “escalation” of theft into robbery, on determining the moment of the end of theft from protected property objects, etc. 19. The theft is considered completed from the moment when the culprit has the opportunity to dispose of the stolen property at his own discretion. 20. The subject
of theft can only be a person who has the authority of the owner or other possessor of the stolen property.
Secret seizure of entrusted property must be qualified as misappropriation (Article 160 of the Criminal Code). 21. The subjective side of theft is expressed in direct intent. 22. Theft committed by a group of persons by prior conspiracy (clause “a”, part 2 of the commented article). In accordance with Part 2 of Article 35 of the Criminal Code, a crime (including theft) is recognized as committed by a group of persons by prior conspiracy if it involved persons who agreed in advance to commit the crime. The conspiracy to commit a crime must take place before the commission of the crime. The time elapsed from the moment of conspiracy to the commission of the crime is irrelevant. 23. Within the meaning of the law, persons who have committed a group theft by prior conspiracy are co-perpetrators, since each of them participates in the commission of actions directly included in the objective side of the crime. Co-execution does not exclude the distribution of roles between the participants of the scenes. Each of the co-perpetrators is liable for the crime in full of the stolen property, regardless of the size of the share he received. 24. The commission of theft by a group of persons by prior conspiracy does not exclude the presence of accomplices (instigators, accomplices) who did not participate in the implementation of the objective side of the crime. Their criminal liability comes under the commented article with reference to Art. 33, 34 of the Criminal Code. 25. Theft committed with illegal entry into a premises or other storage facility (clause “b” of part 2 of the commented article), as well as with illegal entry into a home (part 3 of the same article) poses an increased public danger, since the criminal encroaches for property, as a rule, the most valuable, for which more reliable security measures are objectively provided. 26. Under the premises
according to note.
3 to the commented article refers to buildings and structures, regardless of the form of ownership, intended for the temporary residence of people or the placement of material assets for production or other official purposes. Other storage
means utility premises separated from residential buildings, areas of territory, main pipelines, and other structures, regardless of the form of ownership, that are equipped with fencing or technical means or provided with other security and are intended for permanent or temporary storage of material assets.
Unfenced or unguarded areas used for storing material assets, cabins, car interiors located on unguarded platforms do not meet the concept of storage, since they do not create barriers to sufficiently free access to the property located there. 27. Entry
for the purpose of theft should be understood as a secret or open intrusion into a home, premises or other storage facility.
Penetration can be accomplished either with or without overcoming obstacles or human resistance. If a perpetrator, with the help of devices, removes someone else's property from a home, premises or other storage facility without entering them, then he also commits entry. 28. There is no qualifying sign of “penetration” if a person was in the premises or other storage area lawfully, without criminal intent, but then committed theft, robbery or robbery. This qualifying feature is also absent in cases where a person ended up in a home, premises or other storage facility with the consent of the victim or persons under whose protection the property was located, due to family relations, acquaintance, or was in the sales area of ​​a store, office and other premises open to visits to citizens (clause 19 of the resolution of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation dated December 27, 2002 No. 29). 29. Theft cannot be considered committed with penetration if it was committed by a person who has access to a home, premises or storage facility due to his official position or due to the work performed, as well as by a person who has one-time access to the specified premises. 30. Point “c” of Part 2 of the commented article contains a qualifying feature
- causing significant damage to a citizen, similar to that found in the Criminal Code of the RSFSR in Art.
144, 145, 147 sign - causing significant damage to the victim. With the adoption of the Federal Law of July 1, 1994 No. 10-FZ “On Amendments and Additions to the Criminal Code of the RSFSR and the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR”1 {SZ RF.
1994. No. 10. Art. 1109.} this sign related to theft, moreover, of any other person’s property, and not just that belonging to an individual.
Explaining this circumstance, the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, in Resolution No. 5 of April 25, 1995, proceeded from the fact that the legislator introduced the principle of equal protection of all forms of property. He recommended that the courts, when deciding whether the actions of the perpetrator contained signs of causing significant damage to the owner or other owner of the property, proceed both from its value and from other significant circumstances. The Plenum included, in particular, the following: the financial situation of an individual, the significance of the lost property for the owner or other possessor. The clarification remains valid at the present time, but only in relation to individuals, since according to the Criminal Code, theft committed with the infliction of significant damage will only occur if there is an attack on the property of a citizen. Federal Law of December 8, 2003 No. 162-FZ “On Amendments and Additions to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation”2 {SZ RF.
2003. No. 50. Art. 4848.} the concept of significant damage when committing thefts, liability for which is provided for in Ch.
21 CC. According to the note. 2 to the commented article “significant damage to a citizen in the articles of this chapter is determined taking into account his property status, but cannot be less than two thousand five hundred rubles.” 31. The value of property for qualifying a crime is taken into account on the day it was committed, and when determining the amount of material damage resulting from a criminal attack, on the day the decision on compensation for damage was made, with its subsequent indexation at the time of execution of the sentence in the manner prescribed by Art. 369 Code of Criminal Procedure3 {See.
See also: BVS RF. 1995. No. 7. P. 3.} , art.
397, 399 Code of Criminal Procedure. 32. Considering the prevalence of so-called “pickpocketing,” the legislator provided for liability for these thefts in a separate paragraph of the commented article. Responsibility for thefts committed from clothes, bags or other carry-on luggage that were with the victim is established by clause “d”, part 2 of this article. 33. For theft committed with illegal entry into a home or on a large scale, liability arises under Part 3 of the commented article. Under the dwelling,
as indicated in the note.
to Art. 139 of the Criminal Code, means an individual residential building with its residential and non-residential premises, residential premises, regardless of the form of ownership, included in the housing stock and suitable for permanent or temporary residence, as well as other premises or buildings not included in the housing stock, but intended for temporary residence. The concept of housing
also covers its components used for recreation, storing property or meeting other human needs (balconies, built-up verandas, storage rooms, etc.)1
{USSR Air Force.
1986. No. 6. P. 5.} .
What was said earlier about thefts from premises or storage facilities fully applies to thefts committed from a home. 34. Theft is considered committed on a large scale (Part 3 of the article under comment) if the value of the stolen property exceeds 250 thousand rubles. 35. The commission of several thefts should also be classified as theft on a large scale if the total value of the stolen property corresponds to the large amount established by law, and the thefts were committed in one way and under circumstances indicating an intent to commit theft on a large scale. 36. When qualifying actions under Part 3 of the commented article, the amount of theft is determined by the value of the stolen property. The resolution of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation dated December 27, 2002 No. 29 states that “when determining the size of stolen property, one should proceed from its actual value at the time of the crime. In the absence of information about the price, the value of the stolen property can be established on the basis of expert opinions.” Most often, when considering cases, courts have to deal with market prices. In such cases, the value of the thing is established by the court on the basis of evidence indicating the expenses actually incurred for the acquisition or production of the property, the degree of its wear and tear at the time of theft. 37. Theft committed by an organized group or on an especially large scale (clauses “a”, “b”, part 4 of the commented article) are especially qualifying signs indicating the increased danger of these crimes. 38. Theft is recognized as committed by an organized group
(clause “a” of part 4 of the article under comment) if it is committed by a stable group of persons who have united in advance to commit one or more crimes.
The Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, in Resolution No. 29 dated December 27, 2002, explained that “the stability of an organized group can be evidenced not only by the long period of its existence, the repeated commission of crimes by members of the group, but also by their technical equipment, the duration of preparation of even one crime, as well as other circumstances (for example, special training of participants in an organized group for penetration in the storage for the seizure of money (currency) or other material values. ”39. The actions of persons who have done theft as part of an organized group should be qualified as co -execution, despite the fact that some of its members perform not only elements of the objective side of the crime. 40. Under the same circumstances, when committing the theft by a group of persons according to a preliminary conspiracy of the actions of accomplices and other accomplices who did not perform the elements of the objective side of the theft, they must be qualified with reference to Article 33 of the Criminal Code 41. The theft is considered perfect On a particularly large amount,
if the value of the stolen property exceeds 1 million rubles, according to note.
4 to the commented article. 42. Theft committed by a person previously convicted of theft or extortion (paragraph “c” of part 3 of the commented article) is a qualifying attribute
indicating the increased danger of the multiplicity of identical or homogeneous crimes (special relapse).

Article 144 Part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation March 20, 1996

Obstruction is opposition by others by forcing journalists to disseminate information. Coercion can be carried out both by influencing a mass media body: the threat of termination or suspension of its activities, destroying the circulation or part of it, and other similar acts, and by influencing the journalist himself.

In particular, coercion can be expressed in the use of violence against the journalist himself or his relatives, in the threat of its use, in the destruction or threat of destruction of property, the threat of dismissal, demotion, blackmail, i.e.

the threat of disclosure of undesirable information and other actions that violate the legal rights and interests of the journalist (dissemination of information discrediting the journalist and his relatives), etc.

Article 144

shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles, or in the amount of the wages or other income of the convicted person for a period of one to two years, or by compulsory labor for a term of up to four hundred eighty hours, or by corrective labor for a term of up to two years, or by forced labor labor for a term of up to two years with deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years or without it, or imprisonment for a term of up to two years with deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years or without such.

shall be punishable by a fine in the amount of one hundred thousand to three hundred thousand rubles, or in the amount of the wages or other income of the convicted person for a period of one to two years, or by compulsory labor for a term of up to four hundred eighty hours, or by corrective labor for a term of up to two years, or by forced labor labor for a term of up to two years with deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years or without it, or imprisonment for a term of up to two years with deprivation of the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a term of up to three years or without such.

Article 144 Part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

The subject of the crime provided for in Part 1 of the commented article is a person who has reached the age of 16. If a person acted on behalf of a body, institution or organization, he bears only personal responsibility for his actions, regardless of the administrative or other responsibility of this organization.

1. Obtain, receive and disclose information.
2. It can be located in government agencies, enterprises, and public bodies.
3. Can obtain information from documents and materials, but only those that do not contain state secrets.
4. Can make video recordings as well as audio recordings. But only if it is not prohibited by law.
5. Journalists have the right to visit places of disasters, emergencies, rallies and various places where citizens gather.
6. He has the right to express his thoughts and opinions, which are signed with his signature.
7. A journalist may refuse material and its assessment if they do not fit his beliefs.
8. A journalist may refuse his signature, in which case, when editing his information, everything was distorted.
9. If all instructions of the law are not followed, then the perpetrators can be punished under Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

We recommend reading: Find out last name by snils

Article 144 part 2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

That is, an official is a person who permanently or temporarily performs the work of a representative of a government agency performing administrative functions, economic functions, local government bodies, municipal institutions, as well as the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

Residents of Hong Kong can stay in Russia without a visa for 14 days if they have a valid passport from the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China.

Residents of Macau (China) - “Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Macau Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China on the mutual waiver of visa requirements” (Macau, June 19, 2012).

Residents of Macau can enter Russia without a visa for 30 days if they have a valid passport from the Macau Special Administrative Region of China.

Belarus, the government of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the government of the Kyrgyz Republic, the government of the Russian Federation and the government of the Republic of Tajikistan on mutual visa-free travel of citizens Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the conditions of mutual travel of citizens of the Russian Federation and citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina (New York, September 24, 2007) Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Federative Republic of Brazil on the waiver of visa requirements for short-term trips of citizens of the Russian Federation and citizens of the Federative Republic of Brazil (Rio de Janeiro, November 26, 2008) Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on the waiver of visa formalities for mutual trips of citizens of the two states (Caracas, November 26, 2008

The Federal Tax Service has once again warned accountants and heads of organizations, as well as individual entrepreneurs, about letters demanding payment of tax debts, which are sent by email from scammers on its behalf. Such letters cannot be opened, much less clicked on the links they contain, tax officials remind.

Working with children with a criminal record under Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

There is no need to pay tax for a stolen car. The main thing is to promptly provide the territorial body of the Federal Tax Service with a certificate from the body of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, which is dealing with the case of car theft. Such certificates will need to be provided to the tax authorities every year until the stolen car is found or deregistered.

Source: https://uristsos.ru/avtoyurist/st-144-ch-2-uk-rf-20-03-1996

Second commentary to Art. 218 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

1. The subject of the crime is explosives, flammable substances and pyrotechnic products.

2. The objective side is expressed either in violation of the rules for accounting, storage, transportation or use of dangerous substances, or in the illegal transfer of these substances by mail or luggage, if these acts negligently resulted in the infliction of serious harm to the health or death of a person.

The crime is considered completed from the moment the consequences occur in the form of causing the death of a person or serious harm to health.

3. The subjective side is characterized by a careless form of guilt.

4. The subject of the crime is a special one: a person whose work activity is related to the circulation of explosives, flammable substances and pyrotechnic products. The subject of illegal shipment and transportation of these substances and products can be any person over the age of 16 (for example, passengers).

Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in 1995

The Criminal Code of the RSFSR has the task of protecting the Soviet social and state system, socialist property, personality and rights of citizens and the entire socialist legal order from criminal attacks. To accomplish this task, the Code determines which socially dangerous acts are criminal and establishes the penalties to be applied to persons who have committed crimes.

Article 262

Violation of the regime of nature reserves, wildlife sanctuaries, national parks, natural monuments and other specially protected state natural areas, resulting in significant damage, is punishable by a fine in the amount of up to two hundred thousand rubles or in the amount of the wages or other income of the convicted person for a period of up to eighteen months, or by deprivation the right to hold certain positions or engage in certain activities for a period of up to three years, or compulsory work for a period of up to four hundred eighty hours, or correctional labor for a period of up to two years.

shall be punishable by imprisonment for a term of up to three years, or correctional labor for a term of up to two years, or a fine of up to fifty times the minimum wage.

Theft committed repeatedly, or by prior conspiracy by a group of persons, or with penetration into a home, premises or other storage facility, as well as causing significant damage to the victim - Note. In Articles 144 -

On October 13, 1998, he was detained in Moscow, Novoyasenevsky Pt.

1 (228 part 1; heroin 0.35 g). February 17, 1999 Moscow, Cheryomushkinsky court sentenced to 2 years under Art.

228 part 1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Start of term: October 13, 1998.

On January 14, 2003, he was detained in Astrakhan, Kirovsky district.

(228 part 1; opium 9 g, 222 part 1; RGD-5). In 2003, the court of

Astrakhan was sentenced to 3 years (suspended) under Art.

222 part 1, 228 part 1. Start date: January 14, 2003.

April 23, 2008 Novocheboksarsky court.

Slavery of thought, conscience and word

Of all the Western democracies, so far only the United States cannot go to jail for expressing incorrect beliefs.

In the rest, where constitutions often also proclaim freedom, you can easily end up in prison for years.

Nadezhda Trump proposed an ideological test for migrants. That is, the era of freedom of belief has ended irrevocably, even if this rebel suggests such a thing. No, I have no illusions that there has ever been real and complete freedom of opinion anywhere.